Ethical Guidelines for Reviewers
PRSH follows the ethical principles recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Reviewers should:
- Treat manuscripts as confidential documents.
- Provide unbiased and respectful feedback.
- Avoid personal criticism of authors.
- Evaluate manuscripts based solely on academic and scientific criteria.
- Disclose conflicts of interest.
- Respect intellectual property and confidentiality.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers invited by PRSH are expected to:
Areas of Expertise
PRSH invites reviewers with expertise in, but not limited to:
Sport Psychology
- Competitive anxiety and stress
- Motivation and self-efficacy
- Psychological skills training
- Athlete mental health
- Coaching and referee psychology
Exercise Psychology
- Physical activity behavior
- Exercise adherence
- Mental health interventions
- Special populations and physical activity
Health Psychology
- Chronic disease and rehabilitation
- Health behaviors
- Quality of life
- Psychological interventions
Positive Psychology
- Well-being
- Resilience
- Self-compassion
- Psychological growth
Neuroscience and Technology
-
- EEG and neurophysiological assessment
- Brain–behavior relationships
- Digital health interventions
- Artificial intelligence applications
- Psychometric assessment and validation